Sunday, October 31, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 183 - The Exorcist


The Exorcist is one of the scariest movies ever made and even after repeated viewings it still has the power to make me jump.

The new HD Blu-ray disc is a revelation. The picture is amazing, sharp and crisp with deep colors. Freidkin's use of "flash" visual imagery really pop out. But the new discovery is the sound. The 6.1 channel sound in HD is fantastic. There were two moments where the superb sound channeling had me jump in my seat. The first is when Father Karras is listening to the audio tape of Regan and the phone rings. The second was when Father Merrin arrives at the house to perform the exorcism. The scene is very quiet. He has just come in the door and is greeted by Miss McNeil when all of a sudden the demon cries out his name from upstairs. Well the sound channeling made the voice come from behind my left shoulder. It was so clear it felt like there was someone screaming behind me and I jumped in my seat.

I won't go into detailed review of the movie. If you have not seen it I don't want to give anything away and if you have seen it there is nothing I can say that will improve the experience. I did watch the Blu-ray extended version which includes the spider walk scene. The set also comes with the original theatrical version.

It's a great movie that has withstood the test of time and is still as disturbing as it was in 1973.

At The Movie House rating ****

Saturday, October 30, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 182 - The Innocents


The Innocents is a hauntingly good ghost story starring Deborah Kerr. based on the novella The Turn Of The Screw by Henry James the film was one of the first to feature adult themes in it's horror story.

Kerr is a Miss Giddens a governess hired to look after two children. Their parents are dead and they have been adopted by their uncle (Micheal Redgrave) who does not want anything to do with them. he lives in London and the children live at Bly House, his country estate. Miss Giddens is put in complete charge of the children and the house.

The children Flora (Pamela Franklin) and Miles (Martin Stephens) are adorable at first, but soon Miss Giddens seems to seem more in their behavior than just child like playfulness. She also begins to experience unexplained voices and visions of a strange man and woman.

When Miss Giddens describes the appirition she has seen to the housekeeper, Mrs. Grose (Meg Jenkins) she tells of Peter Quint (Peter Wyngarde), the uncle's former valet who died under odd circumstances. Quint had been having a violent affair with the former governess Miss Jessel, who went into depression and drowned herself after Quint's death.

Miss Giddens realizes that the two have come back from the dead to continue their affair by possessing the children. She goes to extreme lengths to free them from these ghoulish monsters.

The film is shot in stunning deep focus black & white cinematography with carefully controlled lighting to maintain the look of candlelight. Kerr is excellent as the determined but petrified governess and the two children turn in chillingly creepy performances. The film is full of chilling atmosphere and relies on tension and suspense for thrills instead of violence and gore.

An excellent ghost story.

At The Movie House rating *** 1/2 stars

Other films of note:

The Bad Seed
The Others
The Omen
The Exorcist
The Good Son
The Changeling
Ghost Story
The Lady In White
The Uninvited
The Haunting
The Other
What Lies Beneath
Turn Of The Screw
Poltergeist
Rosemary's Baby

Friday, October 29, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 181 - The Bird With The Crystal plumage

Here is another film I went to see at the Pequa theatre in the early 70's.


The Bird With The Crystal Plumage is Italian director Dario Argento's first film. It's a remarkable film for a first time director and much more restrained than his later works. His reputation as the "Italian Hitchcock" is based, in part on this movie.

Tony Musante stars as Sam Dalmas, an American writer living in Rome. One evening he witnesses a woman being attacked. He manages to prevent the murder but he can not help the victim because he is trapped between two glass walls. The police briefly consider him a suspect and then turn to him for help. There have been three other murder, all by the same killer in the past few weeks.

Dalmas becomes curious and begins his own investigation, not realizing that this puts him and his girlfriend Julia (Suzy Kendall) in danger.

The film draws heavily on Hitchcock, especially in the way it treats the audience as voyeur to the killings. Argento gives the film a stylized look with a distinct European flair. The music is by Ennio Morricone and the camera work by Vittorio Storaro.  The film has intelligence, energy and an intricate plot, that probably suffers a little in the translation and dubbing into English.

At The Movie House rating *** stars

Thursday, October 28, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 180 - Double Feature: Tales From The Crypt


Another movie I saw at the Pequa Theatre was 1972's Tales From The Crypt. This British anthology film was based on some of the old EC comic book stories from the 1950's. Unlike mark Of The Devil, this film always stayed with me. Especially the scene with the razor blades!!

The movie tells the story of five tourists who are sight-seeing in catacombs located in Great Britain. They become separated by the rest of the tour group and find themselves trapped in a round chamber with five stone seats and a large stone throne. As they struggle to find a way out a man dressed in the robes of a monk appears and invites them to sit down. He is mysterious and begins to question them when they insist they must leave. One by one he asks them what will happen when they return to the outside world. He helps them see the fates that await them. We watch as each story unfolds:

Joan Collins stars as a woman who murders her husband only to learn there is a homicidal maniac dressed as Santa Claus on the loose. She can't call the police because of the dead body in the living room, but the deranged Santa wants to get in.

Next up is Ian Hendry as a man who plans to leave his wife and children and run off with his mistress. As they make their escape he is haunted by nightmares of a car crash with a gruesome outcome.

Then Robin Philips learns the fate that awaits him for tormenting his poor, harmless neighbor Mr. Grmysdyke (Peter Cushing).

Richard Greene's fate is next as his life becomes a tale similar to the classic story of a Monkey's Paw.

Then finally the officious Nigel Patrick learns the consequences for the mis-treatment he has given the sightless men in his care at the home for the blind that he manages.

All five stories are fun variations on Twilight Zone type stories with ironic or twist endings.

Pretty tame by today's standards, but a lot of ghoulish Halloween fun.

At the Movie House rating ** 1/2 stars

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 180 - Double Feature: Mark Of The Devil




My parents were pretty liberal about what movies I was allowed to watch when I was a kid. Occasionally my mom would take out a copy of The Long island Catholic and tell me that a film I wanted to see was rated "morally objectionable" or even worse, the dreaded "condemned". But my mom is also the one that took me to see The French Connection when I was 11and allowed me to go see The Godfather when I was  13. But I know even my mother would not have tolerated me seeing Mark Of the Devil when I was just 10 years old.

The film proclaimed to be the most violent film ever made. They declared  themselves the first film rated "V" for violent. It advertised that no one would be admitted without a special barf bag. With that kind of marketing it's a film every red-blooded boy would want to see.

It was playing at the Pequa Theatre, in Massapequa and I went to see it with my two brothers. Unfortunately we were turned away at that box office because we were under age. Then out of the blue and older man in line told the ticket seller we were with him and we were allowed in.

To be honest, other than the incident at the ticket booth I really didn't remember anything else about the movie. I had vague recollections of witches being burned at the stake and someone having their tongue pulled out, but that was it. So screening it was like watching it for the first time.

It's a German film that has been over dubbed into English, so most of the voice and dialogue don't match up. It's stars Herbert Lom as a nobleman and witch hunter in Austria. His witch hunting apprentice was played by Udo Keir. The film also features Reggie Nalder (The Man Who Knew Too Much, Salem's Lot).

Set in Austria it tells the story of 18th century witch hunts. Women were tortured and burned at the stake for being witches. The film features very graphic torture scenes. Women are beaten, burned, racked, branded and in one gruesome scene a woman has her tongue removed for blaspheming against the church.

The movie takes everything seriously, while still being extremely exploitative. Realism is achieved by filming in the Bavarian countryside and using a real castle. Costume and period details, including the torture instruments are quite realistic. The film condemns the activities of witch hunters and shows them to be nothing more than rapists and thieves who hid behind the Church to steal and plunder.

The special effects and editing to depict the brutality are pretty good for their day, though none of it compares to the splatter porn that is popular in today's movies.

Mark Of The Devil is a relic from a time when extreme violence was still new to films. 

At The Movie House rating ** stars

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 179 - The Devil's Advocate



After reading the devilishly entertaining book Horns, by Joe Hill I thought I would screen Devil's Advocate as a companion piece.

This 1997 horror/thriller was directed by Taylor Hackford and is like a John Grisham legal thriller combined with The Omen or Rosemary's Baby. The movie starts Keanu Reeves as hot shot Florida lawyer Kevin Lomax. Kevin has never lost a case, but he has crossed one or two moral lines to achieve this outstanding record. His stellar performance is soon noticed by a huge Manhattan law firm run by John Milton, played by Al Pacino.

With an offer he can't refuse Kevin and his wife Mary Ann (Charlize Theron) are soon on their way to the big apple against the better judgement of his mother (Judith Ivey) who warns of the sin and corruption in the big city.

Kevin quickly becomes a star attorney in his new firm, but Mary Ann has difficulty settling in to urban life. And everything is not quite what it seems. Mary Ann is the first to notice as she becomes increasingly more disturbed.

The law firm has many secrets some legal and some....well you'll find out.

Devil's Advocate is a wonderful genre bending piece that combines legal drama with the occult. Al Pacino gives an over the top performance as the mysterious John Milton and Charlize Theron is quite convincing as a woman being driven insane by internal and external demons.

The movie also has a fantastic production design. From the skyscraper roofs to the interiors of the law firm, including Milton's home, the film has a stunning look.

At The Movie House rating *** stars.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 178 - Alfred Hitchcock's Shadow of A Doubt



Shadow Of A Doubt is Hitchcock's first undisputed masterpiece. The director, in numerous interviews has claimed it as his personal favorite amongst all the films he made. The film explores Hitchcock's favorite theme of chaos lurking in the background of everyday life. In this case the life of an ordinary small town family circa 1940's Santa Rosa, California.

Theresa Wright plays Charlotte " Charlie" Newton a small town girl bored with the humdrum existence of her family. then news comes that her favorite uncle "Uncle Charlie", her mother's brother, is coming from the east for a visit.

We have already met Uncle Charlie Oakley, played by Joseph Cotten. He is living in a run down tenement in Newark, New Jersey. He is being watched and followed by two men, whom he goes out of his way to avoid.

He arrives in Santa Rosa, to a hearty welcome by everybody, especially his niece Charlie.  She loves him dearly, but is puzzled by the way he can sometimes be cruel in word and gesture. Than two men arrive claiming to be journalists doing a survey of an ordinary American family. But it is soon revealed they are detectives on the trail of the Merry Widow murderer and Uncle Charlie is their primary suspect.

At first Charlie refuses to believe it, but slowly she comes to accept the truth about her uncle. Knowing she suspects, Uncle Charlie promises to leave Santa Rosa, but then strange and near lethal accidents begin to befall Charlie.

Shadow Of A Doubt is one of the first films to explore the concept of a serial killer in the context of every day life. A bit of dialogue early in the films tells of an accident Uncle Charlie had when he was six and injured his head. Is it placed there to offer an explanation for Uncle Charlie's future behavior as a psychopath? We never actually see any of the murders. Everything Charles Oakley thinks and feels is communicated through the excellent acting of Joseph Cotten. The details of death and murder are left to Charlie's father (Henry Travers) and his good friend Herb (Hume Croyn in his screen debut) to discuss on the porch each night as they explore their innocent fascination with true crime magazines.

Hitchcock captures everything that is good in small town family life in the same film that explores the nature of evil and the potential for murder in everyone.

At The Movie House rating **** stars


More poster art from Shadow Of A Doubt




365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 177 - Triple Feature: Alfred hitchcock's Foriegn Correspondent


Foreign Correspondent is a spy thriller directed by Alfred Hitchcock and released in 1940. It tells the story of an American crime reporter sent overseas to a pre-war Europe to bring send back authentic news bulletins about the crisis in Europe. Through coincidence he becomes involved with a spy ring of Nazi supporters in Great Britain who are trying to stop the peace movement on the eve of WWII.

Joel McCrae stars as reporter Johnny Jones. Stephen Fisher (Herbert Marshall) and his daughter Carol (Lorraine Day) are leaders in the Universal Peace Movement. The movement is hosting a luncheon in honor of Dutch Diplomat Van Meer (Albert Bassermann). When Van Meer disappears from the luncheon and then is later assassinated, Jones becomes involved in the efforts to capture Van Meer's killers.

The film is known for three major set pieces. The assassination of Van Meer in the city square (all filmed on a Hollywood back lot, the chase through the Dutch countryside and the windmill scene, and finally the flight and crash of the Pan-Am clipper plane, a special effects sequence that still holds up today.

Based on current events of the times, Hitchcock had to rewrite the script during filming to keep up with current events. Before it's release an epilogue was added about the bombing of London, which was happening at the time.

Foreign Correspondent is as powerful today as it was in 1940.

At the Movie House rating ****

note - Foreign Correspondent was released in 1940, the same year as Alfred Hitchcock's Rebecca. Both films were nominated for Best Picture and Rebecca won the award. Out of the thirty films Hitchcock made in Hollywood between 1940 and 1975 these were the only two ever to be nominated by the Academy. Hitchcock himself was nominated five times for Best Director for Rebecca, Lifeboat, Spellbound, Rear Window and Psycho. He never received an Oscar for any of his work.

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 177 - Triple Feature: Last Embrace


Last Embrace is a thriller by Johnathan Demme (Silence Of The Lambs), starring Roy Scheider and Janet Margolin. Scheider is Harry Hannan a CIA operative whose wife is murdered and suffers a nervous breakdown. When released from the hospital he believes he has been targeted for assassination but others question his sanity.

This film offers a strong performance by Scheider and a climatic chase around Niagara falls, but it is so full of red herrings and convoluted plot construction that the whole enterprise collapses under it's own script. Suspenseful, but ultimately a failure. Look for Christopher Walkin and Mandy Patankin in small supporting roles.

At the Movie House rating ** stars

Other films of interest:
Blow-Out
Marathon Man
Winter Kills
Obsession
Don't Look Now
Three Days Of The Condor

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 177 - Triple Feature: North By Northwest

It rained all day Sunday so there was not much to do but stay in and watch movies!!. First up was the 50th Anniversary Blu-ray of Alfred Hitchcock's North By Northwest.



North By North West is the quintessential Hitchcock film. When screenwriter Ernest Lehman started the project he wanted to write the Hitchcock film to out do all Hitchcock films. It features the classic wrong man accused theme; big Hollywood stars including Cary Grant, James mason and Eva Marie Saint; it also has set pieces at two of America's biggest places, the United Nations and Mount Rushmore.

The movie is based on an original idea by journalist Otis C. Guernsey, who had created the idea of a fictitious spy. He got the idea from activities of the British Secret Service during WWII. Lehman and Hitchcock took that nugget and created the ultimate chase movie with one of the most iconic scenes ever created for movies; the attempted murder by crop dusting plane.

Cary Grant played Roger O. Thornhill a Madison Avenue advertising man, who gets mistaken for secret agent George Kaplin. He is kidnapped by Mr. Vandam (James Mason) a foreign agent who attempts to murder him by driving him off a cliff, after he has been forcibly intoxicated. Later while trying to clear his name, he is framed for the murder of a Untied Nations diplomat. On the run he crosses paths with Eve Kendall (Eve Marie Saint), the coolest Hitchcock blond there ever was.

From Saul Bass's opening credits, featuring Bernard Hermann's amazing score the film takes you for a thrill ride of suspense, comedy and murder. It is the most accessible of all Hitchcock's films and probably the most entertaining. The picture and sound on the Blu-ray disc are superb.

North by Northwest is the second part of a trilogy that absolutely defines Hitchcock as a filmmaker. Vertigo (1958) North by Northwest (1959) and Psycho (1960).

At the Movie House rating **** stars.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 176 - Psycho II


Psycho II was made for mass market consumption. Some considered it outrageous that Universal even contemplated making a sequel to one of Alfred Hitchcock's films, especially the classic Psycho.

In the end by recruiting Anthony Perkins and Vera Miles to return to the roles of Norman Bates and Lila Crane Loomis, director Richard Franklin fashioned an surprisingly good film that follows the original in story, if not mood and tone.

Franklin carefully included homages to the original film, and to Hitchcock himself with carefully arranged camera shots and set pieces.

Perkins gives a very credible performance as Norman Bates, somewhat cured from his insanity, but still full of tics and and not quite normal. Miles gives Lila a passionate anger that has spilled over into obsession. In addition Meg Tilly, Robert loggia, Dennis Franz and Claudia Bryar round out the cast.

The film takes place twenty two years after the events in Psycho. Norman has been declared sane by the state of California and returns home to pick up his life in the big house on the hill and his sad motel. Lila Crane, now Lila Loomis is vehement about keeping Norman behind bars because he will kill again.

Not long after returning home strange things begin to happen. Is Norman's mother reaching out from the grave or his Norman up to his old tricks again. The thriller gets a bit convoluted but has a nice twist ending.

The film is in color and the murders are more graphic than the original. The film is accompanied by a nice moody score by Jerry Goldsmith, that borrows from Bernard Hermann, but stands on its own.

Universal went on to make two more sequels and a failed TV pilot, but Psycho II is the best of the lot and while it pales in comparison to Psycho it is a neat little thriller by itself.

At the Movie House rating *** stars

Saturday, October 23, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 175 - Double Feature: Les Diaboliques & Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" - part 2


Watching Psycho on the new 50th Anniversary Blu-ray was an eye-opening experience. The film has been restored to a beautiful sharp picture. The whites, grays and blacks shimmer in wonderful contrast. Hitchcock toyed with the use of light and shadow in this movie and over the years most of what took place in the darker scenes was washed out and could not be seen. Distinct details, from the blood splatter in the shower, to the pores in peoples faces are put in sharp relief. But the film still retains the feel of celluloid, rather than some high -def production. You have not seen Psycho until you have seen it in HD.

Hitchcock and Psycho can never be separated. It is the director's most celebrated film. If you ask people for a Hitchcock film, they will respond with Psycho. Yet it is one of his most atypical films. He does not have a cast of really big stars. There is no theme of romance during times of danger, typical of all his films. There is no big ending in a public place, such as Mount Rushmore or the Statue of Liberty. With Psycho Hitchcock wanted to take is art in a completely different direction. By doing so he created one of the most famous movies, and infamous scenes in movie history.

I have seen the film so many times its hard to remember what it was like to see it with its secrets still intact. The movie is now such a part of pop culture I wonder if the movie can find new audiences that don't the terrible truths the movie contains. I envy anyone who gets to experience Psycho for the first time, with no fore knowledge of what is to come.

The film is a masterpiece that almost didn't get made. paramount Studios fought Hitchcock every step of the way. He ended up having to use the Universal back lot to build his sets, which have since become major tourist attractions. He financed it himself and forgo his usual salary for a 60% share of the gross. The film made him a rich man. He had to fight the Hollywood production code for such scenes as the toilet flushing and of course the infamous shower scene. He ended up breaking many Hollywood taboos and Psycho opened the flood gates for all the slasher films that would follow. Everything from Halloween to the slasher porn popular today owes its roots to Psycho.

Psycho was not well received by the critics. The NY Times critic Bosley Crowther panned it. A critic for the London Observer walked out before it was over and quit her job. Time magazine hated it. Newsweek and Esquire dismissed it. Many questioned Hitchcock's taste and judgement.

But the public loved it. Thanks to the new "no admittance policy" lines for the film formed around the block. It broke box office records in both the U.S, and the U.K.. The film was an enormous hit and became the highest grossing film Hitchcock ever made. Both the N.Y. Times and Time magazine gave the film a fresh look and lauded it with positive reviews. Since it's release the American Film Institute has named it among the top 20 greatest American films ever made. It received four Academy Award nominations and has gone on to have a lasting cultural impact.

In the 1980's Universal produced a sequel, Psycho II, that was a critical and financial successful. This led to two more sequels, Psycho III and Psycho IV: The Beginning, all of lesser quality, and then a failed pilot for a TV series called Bates Motel. In 1998 director Gus Van Zant made a shot by shot remake of Psycho in color. An interesting exercise, but why watch a clone when you can see the original.

If you get a chance I highly recommend you view Psycho in the new HD Blu-ray.

At the movie House rating **** stars

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 175 - Double Feature: Les Diaboliques s & Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho"

Friday night was a double feature of two great thrillers. The French film Les Diaboliques from 1955 and Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho on the new 50th Anniversary Blu-Ray edition.



Les Diaboliques (The Devils) was almost a Hitchcock film. Director Henri-Georges Clouzot beat Hitchcock to the screen rights by just a few hours. The film is based on the novel Celle qui n'etait plus (She Who Was No More) by Pierre Boileau and Thomas Narcejac. The pair also wrote the novel D'entre les morts (The Living and the Dead) which Hitchcock adapted into Vertigo.

Les Diaboliques is a story about a school headmaster whose wife and mistress conspire together to murder him. The cruel and sadistic husband, Michel Delassalle (Paul Meurisse) is the mecurial head of a school for boys. He physically and verbally abuses both his wife, Christina Delassalle (Vera Clouzot), who owns the school, and his mistress Nicole Horner (Simone Signoret) who teaches and lives at the school. The two women come together with a seemingly foolproof plan to murder him during a three day school recess.

I will not spoil the film by describing what happens beyond the basic premise. To tell more would create expectations that are better left unanticipated. The film has two distinct halves that masterfully combine elements of the suspense, thriller and horror genres. Hitchcock couldn't have made a better movie, and he liked it so much that he was inspired to use B&W film for his next project "Psycho".

I had never seen Les Diaboliques so this screening was a real treat. The subtitles were not a problem and I was quickly drawn into this dark tale of conspiracy and murder. The film is now considered a classic  and it deserves it's reputation. It is also one of the first films to feature an anti-spoiler message during the closing credits. The message implored the viewer not to reveal anything about the plot to their friends.

I suggest you go rent this film, grab a bowl of popcorn, turn out the lights and be prepared to participate in an evening of murder and mayhem that will thrill you to the bones.

At The Movie House rating **** stars

**note** If you have seen the 1996 American remake Diabolique, you owe it to yourself to see the original film. If you have not seen the remake, avoid it!








Friday, October 22, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 174 - The Blob (1988)


The 1988 remake of the sci-fi classic The Blob has little to offer except some high tech special effects and a few good scare moments. The best is when a woman trapped in a phone booth tries to call the sheriff's office for help. Another involves a restaurant kitchen and a drain. I won't say more.

I will say more about how poorly executed this movie is. The worst problem is the script. It relies on the characters to act stupidly in order to propel the plot along. From a nurse and doctor or are non-responsive to urgent dries for medical help to a ridiculous U.S. military subplot, the script has really been dumbed down.

Another problem with the movie is the amount of noise the victims make when they die and how much the other folks have selective hearing. A young girl responds to the screams of agony as her date is consumed by the blob. As we see the blob take its first victim she is screaming at the top of her lungs. Yet in a busy hospital no one comes quick enough so she can point to the thing oozing away that just killed her boyfriend. In the next seen the blob oozes into a car while a young girl sits and waits for her date who is mixing drinks at a mini-bar in the trunk. There is no noise or movement in the car. Then when he climbs in the car and discovers his girl has been consumed and the blob attacks him there is blood, screaming and violent shaking of the car.

In the next attack there are four people alone in a diner. The cook in the kitchen, the waitress and two customers in the restaurant. When the cook is attacked and starts screaming the other three don't come rushing in. The waitress wanders in while he is being consumed without a clue of what's happening. When she sees the blob eating the cook she screams and the two customers here her and come rushing in. Careless script writing like that really detracts from the realism of any type of horror movie.

The writers kept the subplot of the juvenile delinquent hero, played in the original by a young Steve McQueen, and in the remake by Kevin Dillon. Dillon and all the others town people are one note stock characters there to be eaten by the blob according to the screenplays needs. Even the blob does not behave the same way in every scene. It does what the script tells it to in order to keep the hero's in the maximum amount of danger without being eaten. The only interesting person in the whole town is the Reverend meeker, played by Del Close. They film gives him an interesting epilogue that is more intriguing than the entire movie that came before.

At The Movie House rating ** stars. Original vs. Remake - stick with the original.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 172 - How To Train Your Dragon



The other night we watched How To train Your Dragon on Blu-ray  and I am disappointed that I did not take the opportunity to see it in the theatre in 3-D. 


There have been hundreds of movies about children who are misfits and misunderstood by their parents. No one recognizes them for who they are and what they can do until they go off on some adventure and end up saving the day. Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, Mulan, Kung-Fu Panda, The Wizard Of Oz, Dumbo and Edward Scissorhands all come to mind. It seems that each generation of kids gets to experience this type of story in their own special way. For 2010 Dreamworks produced the highly entertaining How To Train Your Dragon.

The film tells the story of a viking boy named Hiccup, who does not have the fighting instinct of his warrior dad. he also does not seem to have the physical stamina of a viking. But what he lacks in brawn he makes up in brains and one fateful night he uses one of his inventions to catch the mysterious Night Fury dragon. The dragon is injured by his net firing cannon, but not mortally wounded and Hiccup discovers he does not have it in him to slay the dragon. Instead he sets it free. This begins a relationship between the boy and the dragon that starts out in fear but ends in friendship.

Hiccup learns the vikings have been all wrong about dragons. he also learns ways to tame dragons that make him look like an expert warrior at dragon fighting school. But everything goes wrong when the day comes for Hiccup to complete his viking training and slay his first dragon.

The films best moments are in between the boy and the dragon, especially the flying sequences. Their are enough other characters  for kids to relate to and enough comedy and action so the parents won't get bored.

The movie, based on the children's book of the same name, is not groundbreaking in it's story, but visually it takes animated films to new heights.

How To Train Your Dragon *** stars.

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 173 - The Fly (1986)


In 1986 David Cronenberg took on the task of remaking the 1958 sci-fi thriller The Fly. The original was a suspense mystery with some horror elements added; a man with the head and arm of a fly; and had one of the great endings of all sci-fi films with the small man-fly cries of "help me!" "help me".

Croneberg left the basic premise of man being combined with a common housefly through the use of a teleportation device, but re-imagined the rest of the film into a gore filled drama about the nature of disease and aging.

Jeff Goldblum, in his best performance, plays scientist Seth Brundle. He has invented a teleportation device and one night in a drunken fervor he tests it on himself, unaware a fly has entered the pod. The result, instead of a mutant creature is a genetically re-engineered human who has the his DNA combined with the fly. At first, unaware of what has happened he thinks his device is responsible for purifying his body and giving him new found physical vigor, but as the fly DNA begins to make itself known he realizes something has gone terribly wrong.

Geena Davis co-stars as Veronica Quaife, a reporter for a science magazine who falls in love with Seth and much watch horrified as he begins to mutate. The chemistry between Davis and Goldblum is excellent since the filming captured their off screen romance. Geena Davis also gets to say the great movie tag line "Be afraid!" "Be very afraid!". John Getz also stars as Stathis Borans, Veronica's boss and former lover.

The special effects, make-up and puppetry work were state of the art for 1986 and still hold up today. The film has a tight running time of 95 minutes in which we watch the fly creature develop until it is more insect than human.

The remake of The Fly is an excellent example of re-imagining a classic film while staying true to the basic source material.

At the Movie house rating ***1/2 stars Original vs. Remake - Love the ending of the original but the remake offers more thrills.

*note - the original The Fly had two sequels and the remake had one. Cronenberg has announced he may remake the film again using CGI for the effects. The Fly was also adapted into an opera by film composer Howard Shore

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 172 -John Carpenter's The Thing (1982)


After the successful remake of Invasion of The Body Snatchers John Carpenter decided to tackle another sci-fi classic, The Thing From Another World. For his remake he went back to the source material; the novella Who Goes There by John W. Campbell: and created a more faithful adaptation. He also shortens the title to simply The Thing.

He retained the Antarctic isolation and in added the ability for the alien monster to assume the shape of any creature it wants. So the movie feels like a mix of Alien, Body Snatchers and And Then there Were None.

This was Carpenters first big budget studio picture and he pulled out all the stops for state of the art special effects. But it feels like the director spent so much time on the effects that he forgot to build character and drama into the script.

If you are unfamiliar with the story; thousands of years ago an alien craft crash landed in the Antarctic. A group of scientists, for this film Norwegians, find the frozen craft and try to get it out of the ice. They also discover an alien frozen in the ice. When they defrost it, it comes back to life and starts killing everyone. After it's done killing everyone on the Norwegian team it invades the American outpost. Kurt Russell, Wilfred Brimley, Keith David, Richard Dysart and Donald Moffat all turn in solid performances.

The film has some great scary moments but suffers from some of the characters doing dumb things and over the top effects at the end that sacrifice story for visual impact. And we never do get to see what it really looks like.

At the Movie House rating **1/2 stars. Original vs. Remake - go with the Original

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 171 - Invasion of The Body Snatchers (1978)


The Second Annual Mystery, Murder, mayhem and monsters festival continues with a look back at classic sci-fi remakes. We will be looking at some of the best 1980 versions of 1950's science fiction movies. First up on the program is Philip Kaufman's remake of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.

If you have seen the original 1956 version (watched and reviewed here on September 13th:)
(At The Movie house: Invasion Of The Body Snatchers) you know that director Don Siegel added a prologue and epilogue to his film to give the movie a more upbeat ending after the studio insisted the film could not end with Kevin McCarthy screaming into the camera "They're here! They're here!"

In 1978 Philip Kaufman was not subject to studio interference and he was able to make one of the most iconic horror films of the 70's with an ending that can't be forgotten.

The remake follows the original film faithfully. Kaufman added an opening that shows us how the aliens arrive and uses some creepy special effects to show the pods beginning the attachment process.

The film is filled with paranoia. The opening shots show a teacher who is having her students gather these strange flowers carefully watching Brooke Adams as she walks through the park, then the camera cuts to a priest on a swing (a cameo by Robert Duvall) also watching and making eye contact with the teacher. The paranoia continues as the pod people begin taking over the city.

Kaufman replaced small town life with the urban bustle of San Francisco. This increases the isolation the victims feel since city life already begins to de-humanize us from one another. In a clever seen Leonard Nimoy plays a psychiatrist who uses 1970's era psycho-babble of the "me generation" to assure a woman that her husband is really her husband.

Donald Sutherland plays Matthew Bennell, instead of a doctor he is a public health official. Brooke Adams is Elizabeth Driscoll and she also works in the health department. The two have an obvious flirtation, but Elizabeth has a lover named Geoffrey (Art Hindle). Geoffrey goes to sleep with the small pod flower on his bedside table in a glass. In the morning he is sweeping up broken glass and acting very different. he takes a bag of trash out to a garbage truck that is filled with piles of gray dusty fibers. Soon garbage trucks are all over the city.

The tension builds slowly until we get to the key scene where the Bellicecs (Jeff Goldblum and Nancy Cartwright) find a body that isn't a body in their spa. Then the film kicks into high gear as the four main characters soon become the only humans left in town.

Great special effects and a moody, spot on score highlight the action and really make this remake a great film, many will argue that it is better than the original. I enjoy them both for different reasons. Without a doubt teh 1978 version of Invasion Of The Body Snatches is one of the best remakes of any Hollywood film.

Look for Kevin McCarthy in a great cameo repeating his dialogue from the 1956 film.

At The Movie House rating ***1/2 stars Original vs. Remake - Tie! They are both worth seeing.

Monday, October 18, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 170 - Family Plot



The Second Annual Mystery, Murder, Mayhem and Monsters film festival continues with the final film of Alfred Hitchcock's career.

Family Plot was Hitchcock's 53rd motion picture and even at the age of 76, he was not done experimenting.  His previous film was Frenzy in 1972. Frenzy was his most successful film since Psycho in 1960. So many were surprised when his next film turned out to be something completely new and different. Hitchcock invented the black comedy/noir thriller about eight years before the Coen Brothers released their first film.

Family Plot follows two couples and we watch as their paths cross and then collide. The first couple is Blanche Tyler (Barbara Harris) a fake psychic, and her boyfriend actor/cab driver George Lumley (Bruce Dern). One of Blanches' clients, the aged Mrs. Rainbird, has been asking Blanche to use her psychic powers to find her long lost nephew. Years ago she convinced her sister to give the illegitimate child away. Now she wants to find him and make him heir to the Rainbird fortune. She has promised Blanche $10,000 if she can locate him.

While Blanche is telling George all this in his cab he almost runs down a pedestrian in the street. The camera leaves George and Blanche and follows this woman dressed in black. She is Fran (Karen Black) and she is on her way to receive a ransom for a shipping magnate that she kidnapped along with her husband Arthur Adamson (William Devane). By day Arthur runs a respectable jewelry shop and by night he and his wife are master criminals who engineer elaborate kidnappings for diamonds.

It so happens Arthur is also the long lost nephew of Mrs. Rainbird. Through some luck and some detective work Blanche and George are on Arthur's trail, but considering the life of crime he leads, he assumes the worst and decides they must be eliminated.

The film has many signature Hitchcock moments, but it is a definite departure in style and tone for the director. It is acknowledged that his first assistant director Howard G. Kazanjian did most of the location shooting, including the out of control car scene, because Hitchcock was to infirm to go on location. But Hitchcock was so meticulous in his notes and storyboarding that Kazanjian was able to shoot the scene exactly as Hitchcock envisioned it, without the director being there.

Much of the dialogue is overtly sexual in nature: Hitchcock often explored the connection between sex and danger and modern attitudes allowed him to be more open about it in Family Plot.

The movie has two unique features. The first is the fact that Hitchccok chose not to identify where the action took place. The film was made in southern and northern California, but Hitchcock removed all referneces to actual places. The second is the films score. On his last film Hitchcock hired a young composer who was working at Universal Pictures, John Williams. When working with Hitchcock on the score the director told him "remember, murder can be fun". The resulting music is quite playful and diffenet than previos music associated with a Hitchcock film.

The film manages to be both funny and suspenseful at the same time. All the actor's turn in great performances with Devane being especially sinister. I personally felt the director let the critical car scene become to comical, but aside from that I found it to be a perfectly delightful thriller and another outstanding film by the best director who ever lived.

At The Movie House rating *** 1/2 stars

Other Films of Interest:

Seance on Wet Afternoon
Hopscotch
The Amzing Mr. X
Foul Play
Charade
Raising Arizona
The Big Lewbowski
Burn After Reading

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 169 - Topaz



In 1969 Roger Ebert had the opportunity to interview Alfred Hitchcock during a promotional tour for Topaz. Ebert commented that the film had not been previewed for critics yet so he could not ask Hitchcock specific questions about the film. Hitchcock replied.

"No matter," he said. "You'll see it soon enough. You'll only like it the second time . . . that's what I think. My pictures become classics, magically, with age. The critics never like them first time around. I remember when 'Psycho' first came out; one of the London critics called it a blot on an honorable career. And Time magazine panned it so badly that I was surprised, a year later, to find them referring to someone else's thriller as being 'in the classic "Psycho" tradition,'

Psycho was not well received by critics, neither was Lifeboat, Marnie, The Trouble With Harry or I Confess. The mainstream press climbed all over itself to supply negative reviews about Vertigo. It is now widely considered one of the best films ever made.

The same can be said for Topaz, Hitchcock's most troublesome film. Based on the best-selling novel by Leon Uris, Topaz is a true-life story about the Cuban missile crisis and a spy ring operating in France that was feeding secret NATO information to the Soviet Union.

Topaz is on of Hitchcock's most ambitious films with the story-taking place in Moscow, Copenhagen, Washington, New York and Paris. The film opens on a military parade in Moscow where we learn a top official in the KGB plans to defect on while on vacation. The story moves to Copenhagen where we observe the family behaving like tourist while KGB agents follow them around. Two great suspenseful set pieces happen in this scene. The dialogue free piece in the china shop, and then later when the family makes a mad dash for freedom outside a Danish department store. Here we meet CIA agent Michael Nordstrom (John Forsythe)

In Washington the KGB officer is debriefed and we learn that he has been privy to vital NATO documents. We also learn that there has been a secret meeting between the Soviet and Cuban delegations at the United Nations. The Cuban security officer is in possession of documents that spell out this arrangement.

Nordstrom convinces Andre Devereaux (Frederick Stafford) a French agent to find a way to view these documents. Devereaux enlists the aid of Phillipe Dubois (Roscoe Lee Brown) a French spy who operates out of a Manhattan florist shop to accompany him to Harlem. In one of the films tensest moments, a classic Hitchcock set piece, Dubois bribes one of the Cubans to borrow the documents so they can be photographed. 

Devereaux agrees to assist the Americans further by traveling to Havana to bring back solid evidence of the Soviet missile activity. this is more than his wife Nicole (Dany Robin) can bear. She does not support her husbands spying for the Americans and she knows he has a mistress in Cuba. 

Devereaux's mistress is none other than Juanita de Cordoba (Karin Dor) window to one of the hero's of the revolution and secretly the leader of the underground resistance. In the films primary set piece Devereaux and Cordoba work together to spy on the Soviets and then Devereaux must smuggle the information out of Cube under the watchful eye of the head of Cuba's security forces Rico Parra (John Vernon).

At this point the movie is at the 110-minute mark and packs enough suspense and action for any spy thriller. But Hitchcock was not done. Because of his activities on behalf of the Americans Devereaux is recalled to France to explain everything he has done. before he leaves the CIA reveal to him that the Soviet defector has information about a secret group cod-named Topaz. They operate at the highest levels of the French government and at NATO. Devereaux must find a way to expose these traitors before he is forced to reveal all he knows about the Soviet and American activity. he also must reconcile with his wife who has left Washington and returned to Paris, where she has taken up an affair with her old flame and Devereaux's good friend Jacques Granville (Michel Piccoli).

Topaz is Hitchcock's longest movie and it has many flaws. The director has said so himself. To start with the film was not made in Hitchcock's usual style. When making a film Hitchcock would accomplish everything before frame of film was shot. he would plan out every detail, and storyboard every shot and camera angle. he would work with his writer to tighten and streamline the script during these planning sessions. On Topaz Hitchcock had no planning sessions. Leon Uris was hired to adapt his book for the screen and when he presented the script to Hitchcock, Hitchcock hated it and threw the entire thing away. He brought in screenwriter Samuel Taylor (Vertigo, Sabrina) to begin a new draft. Because of the late start date Taylor was writing while the film was shooting.

The film relies on long scenes of exposition dialogue. Hitchcock tried many things to make these interesting, for instance the scene in the florist shop, but he understood that a lot of the film was people standing around talking. In addition, and very troublesome to Hitchcock, they were mostly French and Cuban, but they stood around talking English.

Test screening results for the movie were a disaster. The audiences declared it boring and dull. Many wrote in on their comment cards that this definitely was not a Hitchcock picture. And by unanimous vote they hated the ending. Hitchcock worked with Universal pictures to shorten the film by 25 minutes. In addition he created a new ending, but audiences found the new ending confusing, so using footage he already had he created a third ending that worked, but he never found it satisfactory. Audiences also did not like the fact that there was no major Hollywood stars in the film. With the exception of John Forsythe, the movie was cast with unknowns in the major leads. Even now critics agree that the lack of a recognizable star is a major issue with the film. A star would have brought audiences to see the film, but even more important a familiar face would have helped them follow the narrative more closely. A star would have brought them into the story and helped them identify with the protagonist. It has been widely assumed that after having a miserable experience working with Paul Newman on Torn Curtain Hitchcock decided to avoid using popular actors in his film.

With 25 minutes cut the narrative was even more difficult to follow. The film was a box office failure. Many said that Hitchcock had lost his touch, that his old fashioned style was no match for contemporary films such as Bonnie and Clyde and The Graduate. Critics pointed out how much Hitchcock had used studio-processed shots instead of location shooting on Topaz. 

Many critics thought that the Cuban Missile crisis was a bad choice for Hitchcock and he was better working with fictional stories rather than current events. These critics have forgotten how deftly he handled the true life story in The Wrong Man or the many topical stories he did in the past including Foreign Correspondent, Saboteur, Lifeboat and Notorious. In fact Topaz was Hitchcock's second film about the cold war. The first was Torn Curtain released in 1967.

Thirty years later Topaz's reputation has changed. The full film has been restored on DVD and at two hours and twenty-three minutes it his Hitchcock's longest film. The restoration includes the second ending, at the airport, which Hitchcock liked the best, because it was the most ambiguous. The movie has an international flavor to it. For 50 years Hitchcock made films that were either overly British or American, but Topaz is distinctly European.

Topaz is now seen as one of his more experimental films. Hitchcock was never interested in the plot of his movies. He viewed the plot the way a painter views a bowl of fruit. It's something to paint, but the style in which the artists paints it, is what matters. For Hitchcock filmmaking was always about style and about experimenting with story telling in new and unique ways. For Topaz he chose to tell the story through color. He paired each of the characters with significant colors and used them to bring about an emotional response from the audience.

The color of Topaz is yellow, so anything associated with the spy ring was associated with the color yellow. In addition since the agents of Topaz were French, they were associated with yellow too. The Russians and communists were red. Red also meant danger. The briefcase containing the secret documents is a red leather briefcase. In addition he used purple. Purple for death. When you watch the film see how vivid the primary colors are from the costumes to the set decorations.

In addition Hitchcock inserted a flower motif. The flowers signifying death and funerals. There are flowers everywhere; from the Danish china shop; to the homes and hotel rooms; to the florist shop where a funeral arrangement is being made. In a significant scene he also turned to birds again to signify chaos and danger. 

Topaz is not great Hitchcock, but it is good Hitchcock and that's saying a lot. The film is worth seeing just for the murder scene of one of the primary characters. It's an overhead shot that only Hitchcock could conceive.

At The Movie House rating *** 1/2 stars

Other films of interest:
Torn Curtain
The Mackintosh Man
The Spy Who Came In From The Cold
The Naked Runner
The Ipcress File
Funeral In Berlin
Missiles Of October
Thirteen Days

Saturday, October 16, 2010

The Hobbit begins production in February


After much delay Warner Bros. pictures has announced that Peter Jackson will begin directing a two part adaptation of J.R. R. Tolkien's book The Hobbit.  The book will be divided in two parts, similar to the Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows film and be released 12 months apart. Production on both movies begins in February. Both films will be shot with 3-D cameras. 

The production has been delayed due to union issues and the financial mess of MGM Studios which owns partial rights to the story. Jackson who produced and directed the Lord Of The Rings trilogy had planned to produce The Hobbit with Guillermo Del Torro in the director's chair. But del Torro left the project in May after the production delays took their toll. del Torro had been working on the project with Jackson for the past two years. Almost $30 million dollars has been spent on the project so far, without an inch of film being shot. Sets have been built and casting has been under way, but no decisions have been made. 

In addition to Guillermo del Toro, Jackson recruited his screenwriting partners on Lord Of The Rings, his wife Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens, to write the sceenplays for The Hobbit.

Ian McKellen has said he will return as Gandalf, as will Andy Serkis as Gollum and Hugo Weaving as Elrond.

Expect the first film to be released in December 2012 and the second to follow December 2013. And then we an expect a release of the three Lord Of The Rings movies in 3-D (just kidding, well maybe not!)

With this news, every fanboy gets their wish that it would be Peter Jackson who took us all back to middle earth again.


365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 168 - Blow-Up


What was once bold and daring in Michelangelo Antonioni's Blow-Up is now tame. The London "mod" scene has been mocked in the Austin Power's movies. The nudity, sex and depiction of drug use have become common place and modern audiences have been known to chuckle at the so called "orgy" scene. The film, that was once hailed as one of cinema's most important, and named frequently as the best film of 1966, has not aged well. The shock value of showing something new and daring has all but dissipated.

But it's central message and themes have never been more relevant.The film is a study of a disconnected individual, who is distracted by the immediate sensory input of drugs and sex. He has no interests in what he does, and then one day through a coincidence, his passion his reignited. But it can't be sustained and he disappears back into the empty existence he had before.

The movie follows one day in the life of a photographer played by David Hemmings. When we first meet him he is coming out of a poor house. Not because he is broke, but because he goes under cover at night to sleep in the flop house so he can photo-document the men living there. He returns to his studio where he makes his bread and butter by shooting fashion photography. He engages in a photo shoot with a model that is both highly sexual yet very cold. He never really treats the model as a person and only looks at her through the camera. He seems unable to connect with her on a personal level.

We observe this distance between him and his subjects and the world around him. His life is full of sex, booze, women and drugs, and he is bored with it all. You can feel his discontent and weariness with what he does. It is telling that we never see any of the fashion photographs. There are none on the walls of his flat or in the darkroom. When he meets his agent we only see the pictures from the flop house. This is the work that has meaning for the photographer.

While on an outing he shoots some pictures of a couple in the park. Suddenly the woman is at him, demanding the film. He refuses. She follows him back to his studio where she confronts him again. This woman intrigues him. She sees him as a person. They engage in conversation and slowly she warms to him until he lets his guard down and she tries to steal the camera. He stops her, but now he is really interested to know what is on the film. He switches film roles and sends her on his way and begins to develop the film developing process.

The pictures reveal something and after hours of enlarging and studying he begins to believe he took pictures of a murder. Is there a man in the bushes with a gun? Is that a body in the grass?

To be forewarned this movie is not a thriller. There is no solution to the central plot device and there is no other information to who killed who. Some critics have suggested that it was all imagined, but I don't believe so. The photographer and therefore the audience, definitely see a dead body. It's just that the mystery is not the central element of the film.

It's an important film to see if you want to understand the French New Wave and see how modern film making changed in the 1960's. This was the first film made in the U.K. to feature frontal nudity. It's also a film that modern audiences react to in different ways. What was once considered "free love" is now seen as the callous and hateful treatment of woman, for example. It's a perfect time capsule of a period that is long gone, but still captures the disconnection most people feel in modern society.

At the Movie House rating *** stars

Friday, October 15, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 167 - Alfred Hitchcock's "Stage Fright"


I don't think there is a better title for an Alfred Hitchcock film than "Stage Fright". It includes the two things the master of suspense was most interested in; theatricality of life and fear.

Stage Fright opens with large theatre curtain lifting and instead of exposing a stage we are treated to a view of London. This tells the audience that every thing to come is pure theatre. The film cuts to a speeding car with Eve Gill (Jane Wyman) at the wheel. In the passenger seat is Johnathan Cooper (Richard Todd). They are speeding through London and Eve checks to see if they are being pursued by the police. Johnathan begins to recount to Eve how he became implicated in a murder by stage actress Charlotte Wood (Marlene Dietrich). As Johnathan relates his tale we see everything in flashback. How Charlene showed up at his door in a blood stained dress. She claims to have killed her husband. Johnathan returns to her apartment to obtain a new dress and make the murder look like a robbery, but he is seen by Charlotte's personal maid and must flee from the police. He realizes he is crazy to assist Charlotte, but he is madly in love with her and must help. Eve loves Richard and she is compelled to prove his innocence.

In trying to help the fugitive Richard, Eve meets Detective Wilfred Smith (Michael Wilding) whom she must deceive in order to gain access to Charlotte Inwood's inner circle. Eve also enlists the aid of her father Commodore Gill (Alistair Sim).

The movie's primary suspense comes from Eve trying to maintain the charade of being a personal maid and dresser to Charlotte, while avoiding Detective Smith and keeping Johnathan hidden in his house. It's not till the final act do we learn that Eve could be in real danger. As in a play everyone puts on different roles, depending on who they are talking too. And in case we forget we are watching a piece of theatre Hitchcock includes little comic vignettes; the first is when Eve tries on her maid outfit, including glasses stolen from her mother. She can not see a thing but tries to continue her ruse. Later Commodore Gill has a brief interaction with a lady in a shooting gallery (Joyce Grenfell) who makes an indelible performance with her call "Shoot lovely ducks for the orphans." "We're all having a fine time shooting lovely ducks".

Stage Fright was met with a huge adverse reaction by the public when it was released. Hitchcock used a story telling technique that had not been done before and audiences did not like it. Today's audience would not find the technique so objectionable. To tell more would give parts of the story away.

Jane Wyman was at the peak of her career when Hitchcock cast her. It was also a refreshing role for Marlene Dietrich after a series of flops. The rest of the cast was British and this was the first film Hitchcock made in the England since Jamaica Inn in 1939. The film is filled with signature Hitchcock touches including a long crane shot across a street, over a car, up a flight of stairs, through a front door and then up and interior staircase. One wonders what Hitchcock would have done with today's steadi-cams and other modern technology.

Stage Fright is more humorous than most of Hitchcock's other pictures. He made it between the intensity of Rope and the thrilling Strangers On A Train. It has less frantic pace to it and does not offer the suspense of his other films. He was mostly concerned with his exploring his themes of theatre as life and roles within roles. Hitchcock always said life is like theatre, nothing is as it seems. The same can be said for Stage Fright.

At the Movie House rating *** stars

Thursday, October 14, 2010

365+ movies in 365 Days: Day 166 - Alfred Hitchcock's "The Wrong Man"



The Wrong Man is considered by many to be a lesser Hitchcock film and an odd choice for the director who interrupted a string of big budget color pictures to make this film. Many believe the film's serious tone, b&w photography and non-fiction story set it apart from the rest of Hitchcock's work. It is not one of the director's more famous films and I admit that it has sat on my DVD shelf for years and I have not watched it.

After viewing it I can say that the film, though unique because of it's true story background, is a perfect fit into the Hitchcock legacy. If you look at the work that came before and after, you can see how Hitchcock used the story of this unfortunate man to explore his favorite themes.

The movie tells the story about Christopher Emmanuel Balestrero, a husband, father and musician at NYC's Stork Club. "Manny", as he is known to those close to him, is played by Henry Fonda. His wife Rose is played by Vera Miles.

Manny is beset by money troubles. He goes to the life insurance company to borrow on his wife's policy and there he is identified as the man who has robbed the place on two prior occasions. The police are called and Manny is implicated in other local robberies. He is taken in for questioning and as the circumstantial evidence mounts up, he is swallowed by the New York City penal system. He is put on trial for these crimes and the stress of the ordeal causes his wife to have a mental breakdown. Even after he is exonerated her recovery will be a long, hard road.

The film features many of the signature Hitchcock touches that are so subtle we barely notice them. The high and low camera angles, the seamless moving from exteriors to interiors. There is a shot where a jail cell door closes on Manny and the camera moves through a small slot in the door, to the interior of the cell. The most famous shot is where the camera revolves around Manny the first night he is incarcerated. It's not done to show that his thoughts are spinning out of control, but that events around him are in chaos. Another great shot is a close up of Manny praying super-imposed over a man walk down the street, towards the camera. As he gets closer his head films the frame in a double exposure with Manny, then the Manny images fades and we are now looking at the "right" man who looks a lot like Manny Balestrero. The film is notable for it's great period cinematography and for establishing a real sense of what life was like in NYC in the mid-1950's. Hitchcock seamlessly blended footage of NYC locations with Hollywood sound stages so well that many assume the entire film was made on location in New York. Martin Scorsese has mentioned the film as a big influence when he made Taxi Driver.


The Wrong Man features strong performances by the leads. Henry Fonda becomes Manny Balestrero and Vera Miles performance as a woman descending into madness is so subtle it's superb. One can only wonder what Vertigo would have been like if she had played the lead role. 

The film offers a unique look at the justice system prior to the rules impacting defendants rights put in place in the 1960's. We see that the entire system is stacked against Manny. He is presumed guilty by the police. Manny is not allowed to make a phone call. He is coerced into performing identification walks and completing handwriting comparisons. Line-ups are done in groups so witnesses influence each other. Many of his statements are later twisted and used as evidence against him by police.

In Addition to The Wrong Man Henry Fonda made two other films exploring the rights of defendants in the legal system. The most famous is Twelve Angry Men (1957), which he also produced, and Gideon's Trumpet (1980), a made for TV movie about the 1965 Gideon vs. Wainwright ruling that defendants have the right to council.


Chaos interuppting daily life is one of the themes Hitchcock explores in The Wrong Man. He studied the dynamic of a marriage under stress and a family impacted by events beyond their control in The Man Who Knew Too Much, the movie he made before The Wrong Man. He also explored the them of chaos and family in Sabotage, Shadow Of A Doubt, The Trouble With Harry and The Birds.

Other themes explored are:
The Innocent Man (or Woman) - One of Hitchcock's favorites. An innocent person is plunged into events beyond his control and must prove their innocence's, often while in mortal peril or possessing information they must communicate. The 39 Steps, Young and Innocent, Saboteur, Spellbound, Stage Fright, Strangers On A Train, I Confess, Dial M For Murder, To Catch A Thief, North By Northwest and Frenzy

Ordinary Man (Woman) - In addition to a person wrongfully accused of a crime, Hitchcock liked to explore the themes of ordinary people faced with extraordinary situations. This theme occurs in almost all of his films including; The Lady Vanishes, Lifeboat, Shadow Of A Doubt, Rear Window, The Man Who knew Too Much, Psycho, The Birds and Marnie. Often the ordinary innocent person is implicated through another Hitchcock theme, mistaken identity, as seen in The Wrong Man.

Love and Obsession - The end of The Wrong Man, when Manny comforts Rose in the psychiatric ward and she is non-responsive, is a mirror image of a scene that will come in his next movie Vertigo. Driven to madness by love and obsession James Stewart as Scotty ends up in a mental hospital, Madge, played by Barbara Bel Geddes tries to comfort him, to no avail. Hitchcock explored love and obsession in Rebecca, Suspicion, Notorious, The Paradine Case, I Confess, Marnie, Psycho and it is the central theme of his greatest film, Vertigo.

The film is Hitchcock's most serious film. He originally planned his traditional cameo appearance in the cafe scene that comes after the movie opens, but instead, to maintain the tone of the film, he appears before the opening credits to introduce the film. With The Wrong Man Hitchcock proved that real life can be scarier than anything a scriptwriter could dream up.

At The Movie House rating **** stars.

Other Films of Interest:

The Fugitive
I Confess
Witness For the Prosecution
Dial M For Murder
Madeleine
Reversal of Fortune
Presumed Innocent